OT in NT (9): Conclusion
When surveying the verbal changes made by NT authors in their use of the LXX, several patterns emerge. Firstly, in general, the form of verb chosen by the NT author mirrors the content. That is, the point of the passage or clause is not proven by the choice of verbal aspect, but the writer’s intent is supported and strengthened by the chosen morphology. Acts 2:32 is the strongest case of this, where a clear, intentional temporal change is made from David’s Psalm. Peter’s argument depends on his interpretation of David as a prophet who spoke about the present time of Jesus’ death and resurrection—however, the verb form is not the only way this conclusion is derived. The surrounding content leads us to this understanding, an interpretation which is supported by means of his removal of future temporal elements from the verb form and clause.
This coherence between content and morphology, while hardly surprising, explains the exegetical conclusions achievable with such an analysis. In the main, they aren’t a host of earth-shattering readings of NT texts. Comments above are not too dissimilar from popular commentaries. However, looking closely at the verbal semantics can give on a number of occasions some extra nuance to our reading.
We hear the reality of γέεννα, and the urgency of righteousness (compare the imperfective up-close-and-personal Mark 9:48 with the more distant future form of Isa 66:24). With the disciples we can feel the immediacy of the kingdom of heaven. We can stand on this side of the cross and God’s revelation in Christ and see the fulfilment of his promises. Our exegetical conclusions cannot be based only in verbal semantics, but with an appropriate consideration of context looking carefully at the chosen morphology helps to discern the subtleties of particular applications of OT texts to Christ and the church.
The New Testament authors were thus creative in their use of Scripture, but faithful at the same time. They had keen insight in understanding Jesus as the climax of theological history. Old Testament texts are used to show that Jesus is the Messiah, the anti-type of the Davidic King, the one who has ushered in the eschatological age. Furthermore, his people, the church, are also the fulfilment of God’s purposes for his people in Christ. We stand in continuity with Israel, but can see how God has acted for us in Christ as promised beforehand. This theology is of course writ large throughout the New Testament. The edited forms of scriptural verbs employed by the authors simply aids their explanation and confirms their conclusions.
