Spotlight: Internet Pornography

26 10 2008

[NB: 'Spotlight' here refers to a segment we run at church, and has nothing to do with a certain Apple search technology.]

At church recently we’ve been hearing from Jesus (from his Sermon on the Mount) about all manner of human behaviour. In relation to lust, he says this:

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery.’ 
But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.

So what do we do with this? In regard to internet pornography (which as I’m sure you’re aware, is everywhere), how can we ensure we are pure in what we look at? Should I cut off my internet connection (or my eye/hand)?

I want to suggest 2 things that can help out with those who have problems with pornography, even addictions.

porn-again.jpg

The first is an online book written by Mark Driscoll, the pastor of Mars Hill Church. It’s called Porn-Again Christian, and is currently a work in progress - most of the chapters are posted at this point in time, but the rest will be up soon. When it’s complete, you’ll be able to download the whole thing as a pdf document.

This is written for the blokes. Girls, by all means read it, but it’s a (very) frank discussion, and may be something that isn’t all that helpful for you. You can make that assessment though. Guys, go read it. Seriously.

He deals with all the relevant things relating to pornography, masturbation, marriage, and prostitution. Go read.

CELogoNewText.gif

The other thing is software called Covenant Eyes. The name comes from Job 31:1,

I made a covenant with my eyes not to look lustfully at a girl.

The way it works is that you sign up for an account (it costs money, but it’s worth it), and get the software. Once installed on your system it tracks all your internet activity. I mean all - web searches, downloads, ftp, everything.

You nominate one or more ‘accountability partners’, who once a week will get an email listing your internet activity, highlighting anything that it thinks might be a bit suspect. The idea is that these people will then sit down and talk through with you what you’ve been doing online. It essentially makes your private browsing activity (somewhat) public, creating some sort of barrier when you’re feeling weak.

It helps. I’ve got it on my machine. It works for both PC and Mac.

We need to get serious with sin. Internet pornography is a serious thing, a real addiction for many people. Let’s get it out in the open, talk about it, and deal with it properly, so we can be free.





Accusations of Heresy

10 09 2008

I’ve had a post pretty much like this rattling around in my head since the Engage conference, but Bathgate beat me to it:

Accusations of Heresy

Perhaps the fact that I’ve finished my essay, and he’s procrastinating from his, had something to do with it. Regardless, he said pretty much what I’ve been thinking, and said it well. Have a read.





No to Pope?

17 07 2008

I spotted a sign wrapped around a telephone pole on the way home the other day, advertising a rally on the 19th of July [pdf link]. The organisation is called the “NoToPope Coalition”, and apparently stand against the Catholic Church on a number of things, including the right to (at Saturday’s rally):

 

 

  • Defend the right to protest 
  • Say “No!” to homophobia 
  • “No!” to anti-condom policies 
  • Defend reproductive rights 

 

 

The last one is a little curious. I assume that what they mean by that is ‘the right to choose not to reproduce’, but it’s certainly a strange way of putting it. I’ve never before heard of anyone charging the Roman Catholic Church with denying their reproductive freedom. There’s a reason, after all, for all those large Catholic families.





Fighting words?

29 06 2008

Despite sounding like a sub-division of NASA, the Global Anglican Futures Conference has released their closing statement [pdf link].

In terms of world-wide Anglicanism, it’s got some strong words to say. Those words are, however, excellent. There’s a real focus on proclaiming the gospel to the world, staying faithful to our Lord Jesus, and defending the truth from heterodoxy (i.e. divergent beliefs). Awesome stuff.

In terms of the ‘Anglican communion’ that formally exists around the world… well, it now seems as there might be a communion within the communion, a fellowship of confessing Anglicans.

Perhaps the acknowledged, already-present split will become more formal.

It will be fascinating to see what kind of fallout there is after this.

[UPDATE: Insightful commentary by Tony Payne on what this statement means for Anglicans both here and abroad.]





Guess what’s coming next

9 06 2008

There are some (many?) newspaper articles that play out exactly like you thought they were going to. Stereotypes are imported wholesale. Straw men are hastily erected, and attacked mercilessly. Certain phrases capture the thought of the piece so concisely and completely, that reading the remainder of the article is just killing time.

Sort of like watching Titanic.

Two articles from the Herald grabbed my attention for this reason over the weekend. One was a tech article, on the opening of the new Apple store in Sydney. The straw men, in this case, are the ‘mac faithful’:

For the cult who worship the Mac, the company co-founder and chief executive Steve Jobs has become the high priest and the Apple Store his temple. It is a place to go to worship and give thanks for having an alternative to Microsoft, PCs and Windows.

Hmm. That’s right. Mac users are zealots, sort of, you know… different… to normal people.

 

The other was an astounding juxtaposition of ideas, in a short piece on the Anglican church:

 

Archbishop Jensen is one of the leaders of 1000 conservative churchmen from 17 Anglican provinces who will gather at the Jerusalem Global Anglican Futures Conference this month. Mainly from Africa, the Middle East and Asia, they are united on one principal issue: hostility to homosexuality.

But Archbishop Jensen argues: “This dispute is not really about homosexuality. It’s really about authority and who runs the church. And fairly clearly, to most of the rest of us, God runs the church through the Bible.”

(h/t David Ould)

Not a great example of listening skills, it seems. 

Fascinating.

 





To all those who talk of God’s gifts to his church

16 05 2008

Keep talking. It’s a great thing. However:

  • God gives ‘gifts’, not ‘giftings’,
  • Thank God for ‘giving gifts to …’, not ‘gifting …’
  • Whilst you can talk of someone being gifted something, e.g. ‘Joe has been gifted with a remarkable ability with people’, try to avoid it. People in our culture rarely speak like this.

That is all.





A little too late

4 05 2008

This came in just a little late for the college essay on church sacraments and their meanings.

[via indexed]





The act and being of church?

21 04 2008

My doctrine essay is (finally) done. Huzzah! It was on how our understanding of God as triune shapes our understanding of church. Big topic, very interesting.

If you’re interested, here’s a potted summary of what I wrote, entitled ‘The Act and Being of Church? The Limitations of Trinitarian Analogy.’

Our understanding of God as triune has direct implications for our understanding of church. Firstly, we recognise that the church is instantiated by the Trinity, as the Father calls his people to himself by his Son, in the Spirit. The united actions of the persons of the Trinity institute and constitute the church. Secondly, the worship of the church is focussed on the Trinity, as we hear and proclaim the doctrine of God. In recent times analogies have been drawn from the triune relations to an ecclesiology, from Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Free Church positions. Consistently applying models of how the divine persons relate to finite human persons, however, is fraught with difficulty. Models of ‘person’ developed from divine persons are not sufficient to fully capture human personhood, which seriously damages ecclesial models based on such notions. Finally, a proper trinitarian understanding of christology allows us to take church models or metaphors centred on Christ as acceptable, without needing to appeal to flawed or strained ‘full trinitarian’ analogies. We conclude that there is no logical reason for making explicit trinitarian formulations constitutive of ecclesiology, rather an appropriate balance of scriptural and theological categories must be applied, when necessary, to appropriately limit the analogy.





Spotlight

19 03 2008

Spotlight

At our evening church service, I’ve been put in charge of the ’spotlight’ segment. In a 5-minute spot, we take a quick look at various (read: random) things in our world from a bit of a Christian point of view, such as movies, book reviews, mission, pop culture, etc.

Doing it every week, however, can be something of a challenge. Coming up with new segments each week is not the easiest gig… well, at least for someone like me. I’ve done about half a dozen or so, and I’m out. Done. No fresh ideas.

Hmmm.

If you’ve got any ideas of interesting things to consider, drop me a line.

[As a side note, stock.xchng rocks for keynote/powerpoint images, such as the above theme-picture for the segment.]





Mute Voice: How sweet the sound.

25 02 2008

wheelchair.jpg
A number of members of the church I’m part of regularly visits the local nursing home and runs a church service. This is for the residents who are unable to get out and go to church on their own, or even accompanied. These occasional services consist of a number of (traditional) songs, a short talk, some prayer, and afternoon tea. It’s quite lovely, and there are a number of residents who quite obviously look forward to it all month (we can only go every four weeks or so).

I went for the first time on Sunday, and gave an abridged version of the sermon I preached at church. When we were sitting around before the service started, I overheard one of the ladies, who looked a little sour, complain to no-one in particular. She exclaimed “I wish she would shut up! She does it all the time - it’s constant! It’s driving me mad!”

It was only then that I overheard another of the ladies humming, slightly out of tune. She was in a bed-chair, with almost no ability to move herself. She couldn’t speak.

All she could do was make noises in her throat - in this case, she was humming.

I’ve been in nursing homes before, and it always scares me that I might end up so debilitated one day, unable to move or speak… only hum. Yet at the same time I was comforted and a little awed at these Christian people, many of whom had been Christians for twice or even three times my lifespan.

This woman was aged, crippled, unable to speak or move unaided, and hummed all the time. Constantly.

What was she humming?

Amazing Grace.





Research

15 11 2007

Research turns up the most amazing things. 

I came across this little historical tidbit in the process of writing an essay earlier in the year, but it came up again in my study for a Reformation Church History exam next week. It’s taken from The Later Reformation in England 1547-1603, by Diarmaid MacCulloch (1968), in the context of continental theological divisions that existed between Lutherans and Calvinists in England:

Amid these divisions, there were distinctive English theological priorities, but the English added little that was original; indeed, the English lack of capacity for abstract theological invention is so marked through national history as to constitute a dangerously plausible argument for persistent national characteristics.





What a difference a culture makes

6 11 2007

I’ve started reading Mark Driscoll’s Confessions of a Reformission Rev., his story of the birth and growth of his church in Seattle, Mars Hill Church.

In the introduction he talks about Seattle:

one of the nation’s least-churched cities, where only 8 percent of the population is evangelical Christian and 86 percent does not attend a worship service of any religion during an average week

(Confessions, p. 9)

Compare and contrast to the goal of the Sydney Anglican church mission (note that this is the goal, not the actual mission statement itself):

The second step was to adopt a primary ‘goal’ to help focus all the activities of the Diocese’s congregations and organisations. So, under God, and together with other like-minded churches, Sydney Anglicans have adopted ‘10% in 10 years’ as a memorable slogan to summarise their aims.

The Goal >>
To see at least 10% of the population of the region of the Sydney Diocese in Bible-based churches in 10 years.

(http://your.sydneyanglicans.net/mission/articles/what_is_the_mission/)

So in the US an un-churched city has ‘only’ 8 percent in church, while we’re hoping and praying to reach 10% of the population.

And people say that Australia’s culture is a copy of America’s.





Radical Reformission

21 08 2007

Radical ReformissionI’ve just started reading Mark Driscoll’s The Radical Reformission.

It’s an interesting read. Mark is at once insightful, blunt, and engaging. Here’s a sample that illustrates all three:

“My problem was that I thought sin was something you do, not understanding that sin is something you are, like being French Canadian.” (p12)

Nice.

As yet I haven’t read much. It’ll be interesting to see how it pans out over the course of the book.





Philosophy of language

21 06 2007

microphoneFerdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) was a French Linguist, who had an incredible effect on the development of linguistics in the 20th century. He proposed a structural approach to studying language, which looked at the relationships words have to one another: contrasts, opposites, hierarchies of meaning - in short, language in practice. He studied language synchronically, that is, how words are used at the present time (rather than a long-term evolutionary diachronic understanding).

Furthermore, he divided his understanding of linguistics into two areas - the langue, which is like the storehouse of all possible words, meanings, grammar; and parole, the words actually spoken. The langue is present only in a community of speakers, as they understand and develop the particular rules of language to communicate meaning. Different languages do different things.

All of this means that language is astoundingly (and wonderfully) complex. Words can be combined and arranged in such a way as to create new meaning (contra Logical Positivism). Redundancy helps to eliminate detrimental effects of ‘noise’ such as bad grammar, textual corruption, wide semantic ranges, and so on. Having come to understand this through a philosophy class this semester, this skit is simply wonderful.





Spiderman: power and weakness

13 05 2007

At youth group the other day we watched the first two Spiderman movies. It was good fun, with (in my estimation) both movies capturing quite well the comic book graphic novel feel of the original.

There were, however, a couple of things that occurred to me as I watched. One was the way that the dorky, nerdy Peter Parker is transformed into a powerful superhero. As Peter, he is a bit of a hopeless case. As spiderman, he is everything that Parker is not - cool, calm, witty, strong, able to get the girl, in charge of the situation, everyone likes him.
His power, though super-human, is still a very human sort of power. He’s strong and fast in ways that people are, just very much more so.

There’s a real contrast to how real power is displayed, at least in terms of how the Bible presents it. Paul wrote a couple of letters to a church in a city called Corinth, recorded for us in the New Testament. He talks at one stage about the troubles he has had in his ministry, which have been pretty considerable. But the word from the Lord that is his comfort is “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.”

The way that God works seems weak. When we talk about Jesus, it seems like a stupid thing to do. It feels like it’s something that will never change anything… but God uses the message of Jesus’ death and resurrection to change lives. Even the message seems crazy - the Lord of all things captured, beaten up, tortured, and killed like a criminal - that’s supposed to be God’s power displayed? Absolutely. God’s power is displayed at the cross, for that’s the point where the most fundamental change happens - our relationship with God is restored. Talking about Jesus feels stupid and weak and insignificant, but it can be the most powerful thing that we can do. God’s power is displayed in our weakness.

And that’s the thing about Spiderman. His power is displayed in, well, his power. He is a radically different person when he’s in his spidey suit. His power is just human strength amplified. God’s power is far beyond anything a human might do. And it’s made known in ways that don’t seem like human power, so we can’t confuse them. God’s power is clear, and can’t be mistaken for anything else.